Madhubala – Bina Roy – Strange Coincidences!

Bina Roy and Madhubala
1. Madhubala and Premnath first film together was Badal (1951). On the first day of the shooting, Madhubala entered makeup room of Premnath and quickly handed him a fully blossomed red rose and a note. Puzzled Premnath read the note which said that if you love me, please accept the rose, otherwise return it. Premnath was stunned. Without hesitation, Premnath accepted the rose and tucked it into the button hole of his coat and said to Madhubala Kubool hai, kubool hai (meaning I accept it, accept it). Later the same Premnath fell in love with Bina Rai at the sets of Aurat (1953) and married her.
2. Madhubala was cast in the title role of Anarkali in K.Asif’s Mughal-e-Azam when Nargis walked out of the film. At the same time Filmistan’s Anarkali was announced with Bina playing the title role of Anarkali. The film was released in 1953 and was a huge success while Mughal-e-Azam was delayed for another 7 years!
3. Mughal-e-Azam was released in 1960 and was a huge success. But, the Filmfare Award for Best Actress went to Bina Roy for her role in Ghoonghat. A very unfair decision considering the fact that Madhubala was one of the nominees for Best Actress Award for her brilliant role in Mughal-e-Azam (1960).
4. Even though Madhubala is considered the most beautiful Hindi film heroine ever, actress Shyama revealed that she and most of her colleagues, in fact, considered Bina Rai to be the most beautiful heroine in Hindi filmdom in their time, ahead of Madhubala!
I wonder if Madhubala knew that she kept on loosing to Bina Roy in what we call strange coincidences…
Jago Hua Savera (1959)
Pakistani Films Database – 1953
Quiz 3 - Answers
Bollywood - Year by Year - 1911
Mumtaz Shanti - Filmography
love madhubala and i will love if you have more info and gossip about her and dilip kumar relationship
Sara,
For your interest,Madhubala and Dilip kumar were not on talking terms for the entire period of Mughal e azam shooting.
-AD
Excellent writeup and attractive subject too.
I enjoyed it thoroughly!
This is basically for all those who think Madhu ji proposed to Premnathji. Guess many do…
Don’t think it’s all that true because in an interview not very long ago, her sister Madhur Bhushan had said that Premnath ji had expressed an interest in Madhuji but she backed out saying her dad was very strict.So guess all the stories of her sending a rose to his make up room etc is most likely a figment of somebody’s imagination.After all, she was so beautiful, men would like her on their own and she didn’t need to really run after anyone. It’s been also said that much later all three-Bharat Bhushan, Pradeep Kumar, Kishore Kumar proposed to her but she accepted the third, which itself was sort of a bigger error of her life.
And even if she had a crush on Premnathji who looked so dashing at that time, unlike much later on in life, what’s the big deal?She was only 17/18 at that time. People make mistakes in life and she was human after all, though she was a star.Even now teenagers falter,don’t they? She was a teen of the early 50s and was actually taking care of her family.
There are some things which are easily pardonable in life and this could easily be one of the cases…But guess the bigger mistake was- being too obedient a daughter and not being able to stand up to her domineering father when it came to the most important factor of her life, later caused bigger heart aches for this beauty. Many feel that Dilip ji too needed to ease his ego. He was around 30-35 when they were seeing each other. Love is greater than ego any day.
As for Bina Rai ji, she was good looking too, but I never had much information about her. I have known about Madhu Bala, her films and her beauty much more. I am from the new generation and have been learning about classic cinema only gradually. I knew about Bina Rai ji’s grand daughter Akanksha Malhotra who apparently looked much like her and couldn’t make it big some years ago, despite family support in B’wood. I have been checking Bina Rai’s videos on youtube and reading up on her, only now after checking your write -up here. For folks like us, Madhu Bala was/ is a bigger beauty and a star. Yes, she was unfortunate in love, life and it’s heart wrecking for her well wishers of the past and her current fans too who have pages etc dedicated to her. Like this one—-http://www.facebook.com/pages/Madhubala-Magic/269626977739?sk=app_2373072738
Can’t comment much on actress Shyama’s veiws, though I read on this site itself that she found Madhu Bala very beautiful…
But this is what I saw in someone else article about what they thought about Madhu ji’s ethereal beauty—-
“”"”She was perceived as the ‘Venus of the Indian Screen’ (Baburao Patel’s appellation that stuck to her), but how was Madhubala viewed by those of her own generation in the film industry particularly the actress?
‘She was ecstatically, exasperatingly beautiful’, exclaimed Nadira in her characteristic style. ‘She created a kind of reverence, she had such an aura about her.’ Begum Para saw her sometimes in the mornings when she went out for a walk. ‘You saw Madhubala’s face and your day was made. She was a dream really ‘. Nirupa Roy recalled, ‘She was perfect, right down to her toe-nails. There never was and never will be anyone with her looks’.
‘Her complexion was so fair and translucent that when she ate a paan (betel leaf) you could almost see the red colour going down her throat’, recollects Minu Mumtaz. Nimmi confessed to passing a sleepless night after her first meeting with Madhubala on the sets of their common starrer Amar. How would she fare in the film alongside ‘this apparition, this angel in human shape?’
The feeling of being struck dumb was a normal first-time reaction to Madhubala whether the hapless one was Shammi Kapoor or a casual visitor on her sets. For his first picture with Madhubala, P N Arora’s Rail Ka Dibba(1953), Shammi Kapoor, dialogue forgotten and his mind a blank, could only gaze tongue-tied and lost. His brother Shashi Kapoor regretted the fact that he never got to act with her:
‘She had a porcelain beauty, like Dresden china, very fragile, very delicate with a gorgeous infectious smile and very expressive eyes. There was a mystery about her.’ Producer-director Manmohan Desai remarked: ‘She was the only true beauty to grace the Indian screen and she was beautiful in every film with no exceptions.’ Well-known journalist B K Karanjia discovered on first meeting her that ‘none of her published photographs did full justice to her quite extraordinary beauty. He also wrote–”"”I hadn’t met Madhubala (her real name was Mumtaz Begum) earlier, but I had seen several of her films and had been impressed by her attractive personality and her obvious budding talent. I wasn’t prepared for the woman I saw slowly descending a curved staircase from the upper floor. It was as if a vision of beauty had achieved form and presence, in a simple white sari and matching sandals, right in front of my eyes, without a touch of make-up. I was so struck that I forgot my manners and didn’t stand up when, before greeting everyone else, she stood before me, her manicured hands together in a namaste. I struggled to my feet, still feeling dazed, mumbled an apology for not standing up earlier and returned her namaste. With a dazzling smile, showing her pearly white teeth, she put her hands on my shoulders and pressed me down back into my seat. Then she went on to greet my wife and the other guests. My first thought was, “How could the camera have so signally failed to capture that quite extraordinary beauty?” I was to find my answer to that later. I couldn’t take my eyes off her. Her deep brown hair loosened and fell around her shoulders; her complexion I can only describe with the cliché “peaches and cream”. Her eyes were luminous of a light brown, whose shade kept lightening or darkening according to her moods.But they were the most expressive features on her face. So was her voice, soft and low with a sexy huskiness to it. Then, suddenly, the answer came to me. Her films which I had seen were in black and white. Colour had not then come to Indian cinema. Only colour could do justice to the flush even now glowing on her cheeks. “”
Filmfare, the premier film magazine of the time, wrote:
Her complexion is moon-kissed and the smile an irresistible come-hither but stay-where-you-are smile. J H Thakker spoke from a photographer’s viewpoint: ‘You could photograph her from any angle without make-up and still come away with a masterpiece. She was a cameraman’s delight.’”"”"”"
Guess, because of some misfortune again, Madhu ji was over looked at the awards ceremonies. But her legend lives on. Let me give some examples from Hollywood’s golden age here. Even in Hollywood a gorgeous and great actor and the real pioneer of method acting before Brando,Montgomery Clift didn’t win an Oscar despite being nominated a couple of times.Vivien Leigh was considered so beautiful looking on screen that people sometimes disregarded her acting skills. Sometimes luck, good looks and talent don’t go hand in hand. It’s very, very sad but such is life sometimes and everything is in the Almighty’s hand.
Lastly, since all this happened long ago and people around 60 years ago thought differently from us now, it’s difficult to be too sure of things.Journalists, fans, those interested can only do research. And most of the people involved are gone, so I guess it will be better if I too keep the comments subtle. Thanks for the other nice articles.
“This is what I saw in someone else’s article about what they thought about Madhu ji’s ethereal beauty.” Sorry abou the typo.Do check the excerpt from the article pasted…